Why this chapter matters for UPSC: "Popular Struggles and Movements" was Chapter 5 of Democratic Politics II in the 2020-21 edition. NCERT's rationalisation removed it, and the current book (Reprint 2026-27) has five chapters, ending with "Outcomes of Democracy". This page keeps the dropped chapter, labelled as such, because GS2 still asks about its subject. Mains has asked how pressure groups influence the Indian political process and whether informal pressure groups have become more powerful than formal ones (2017), to assess the structure and functioning of pressure groups as "the informal face of politics" (2013), how business associations contribute to public policy (2021), and whether civil society and NGOs can offer an alternative model of public service delivery (2021).

Contemporary hook: Both of the chapter's lessons have been tested since the edition was printed. In Nepal, the chapter's first case, anti-corruption protests led by young people, in which 76 people were killed, toppled the government in September 2025; after the election of 5 March 2026, Balendra Shah became Prime Minister (Al Jazeera, 27 March 2026). In India, farmers camped on the outskirts of Delhi from November 2020 against three farm laws (Associated Press, 19 November 2021); on 19 November 2021 the Prime Minister announced that the government had "decided to withdraw all three agricultural laws" (PIB), and Parliament passed the repeal bill on 29 November 2021 (PRS).


🧠 First Principles — Read This First

Democracy runs on conflict. The chapter opens: "Democracy almost invariably involves conflict of interests and viewpoints. These differences are often expressed in organised ways. Those who are in power are required to balance these conflicting demands and pressures." NCERT's earlier chapters asked how power is shared; this one asks how those who hold power are held in check by pressure from outside government.

Two ways to take part. The direct way is "creating parties, contesting elections and forming governments". Many citizens do not, so they use indirect ways: forming organisations to promote their interests or viewpoints ("interest groups or pressure groups"), or acting together without forming organisations at all. This chapter covers the indirect ways; the next chapter in the 2020-21 book (Political Parties, page 06 of this book) covered the direct way.

Struggle builds democracy. From its two cases NCERT draws three conclusions: democracy evolves through popular struggles; democratic conflict is resolved through mass mobilisation; and these conflicts and mobilisations are based on new political organisations.

Influence, not power. The key distinction of the chapter: "unlike political parties, pressure groups do not aim to directly control or share political power."

A balanced verdict. NCERT weighs the charge that such groups wield "power without responsibility" and concludes: "On balance, however, pressure groups and movements have deepened democracy."


PART 1 — Quick Reference

Table 1: Nepal's movement for democracy (NCERT's account)

WhenWhat happened
1990Nepal, one of the "third wave" countries, won democracy; the king stayed formal head of state while elected representatives held real power
2001King Birendra, who had accepted constitutional monarchy, was "killed in a mysterious massacre of the royal family"
February 2005King Gyanendra "dismissed the then Prime Minister and dissolved the popularly elected Parliament"
April 2006The Seven Party Alliance (SPA) called a four-day strike in Kathmandu, which became an indefinite strike joined by Maoist insurgents and other organisations; "more than a lakh people" gathered almost every day
21 April 2006Protesters numbered "between three and five lakhs" and served an ultimatum to the king
24 April 2006On the last day of the ultimatum the king conceded all three demands: restoration of parliament, power to an all-party government, and a new constituent assembly
After April 2006The SPA chose Girija Prasad Koirala as Prime Minister of the interim government; the restored parliament took away most of the king's powers
2008The monarchy was abolished and Nepal became a federal democratic republic
2015Nepal adopted a new constitution

Source: NCERT, Democratic Politics II, Class X, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition (reprint January 2020), pp. 58-59, as archived by the Wayback Machine, 9 October 2021.

Table 2: Bolivia's water war, 2000 (NCERT's account)

StageWhat happened
The policyThe World Bank pressed the government to give up control of municipal water supply; the rights for the city of Cochabamba were sold to a multinational company
The priceThe company raised the price of water "by four times"; many people got a monthly bill of Rs 1000 where the average income was about Rs 5000 a month
January 2000"a new alliance of labour, human rights and community leaders organised a successful four-day general strike in the city"; the government agreed to negotiate and the strike was called off, but nothing happened
February 2000The police "resorted to brutal repression" when the agitation restarted
April 2000Another strike; the government imposed martial law, but the company's officials fled the city and the government conceded all demands
OutcomeThe contract was cancelled and water supply returned to the municipality at old rates
Who led itFEDECOR, an organisation of local professionals including engineers and environmentalists, supported by a federation of farmers who relied on irrigation, the confederation of factory workers' unions, middle class students from the University of Cochabamba and homeless street children
Afterwards"The movement was supported by the Socialist Party. In 2006, this party came to power in Bolivia."

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, pp. 60 and 62. NCERT gives the water bills in rupees.

Table 3: Two struggles compared

Nepal (2006)Bolivia (2000)
AimTo establish (restore) democracyA claim on an elected, democratic government
Scope"the foundations of the country's politics""one specific policy"
Led byThe Seven Party Alliance of parliamentary parties, joined by the Maoists, labour unions, and organisations of indigenous people, teachers, lawyers and human rights groupsFEDECOR, which was not a political party; the Socialist Party supported the movement
Shared elementsPolitical conflict leading to a popular struggle; mass mobilisation; public demonstration of mass support settled the dispute; a critical role for political organisationsSame
ResultSuccessful; the impact was on the foundations of politicsSuccessful; the impact was on one policy

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, pp. 60-62.

Nepal's movement for democracy and Bolivia's water war, side by sideTwo parallel step flows joined by a comparison. Left, Nepal (NCERT's account): 1990, Nepal won democracy as one of the "third wave" countries; the king stayed formal head of state while elected representatives held real power. 2001, King Birendra was "killed in a mysterious massacre of the royal family". February 2005, King Gyanendra "dismissed the then Prime Minister and dissolved the popularly elected Parliament". April 2006, the Seven Party Alliance (SPA) called a four-day strike in Kathmandu that became an indefinite strike; "more than a lakh people" gathered almost every day. 21 April 2006, protesters numbered "between three and five lakhs" and served an ultimatum. 24 April 2006, the king conceded all three demands: restoration of parliament, power to an all-party government, and a new constituent assembly. After April 2006, the SPA chose Girija Prasad Koirala as Prime Minister of the interim government. 2008, the monarchy was abolished and Nepal became a federal democratic republic. 2015, Nepal adopted a new constitution. Right, Bolivia (NCERT's account): the policy, the World Bank pressed the government to give up control of municipal water supply and the rights for Cochabamba were sold to a multinational company. The price, raised "by four times"; many people got a monthly bill of Rs 1000 where the average income was about Rs 5000 a month. January 2000, a four-day general strike; the government agreed to negotiate, the strike was called off, but nothing happened. February 2000, the police "resorted to brutal repression". April 2000, another strike; martial law, but the company's officials fled and the government conceded all demands. Outcome: the contract was cancelled and water supply returned to the municipality at old rates. Who led it: FEDECOR, supported by a federation of farmers, the confederation of factory workers' unions, middle class students and homeless street children. Afterwards: the Socialist Party supported the movement and came to power in Bolivia in 2006. Below, a four-row comparison, Nepal (2006) against Bolivia (2000). Aim: to establish (restore) democracy; a claim on an elected, democratic government. Scope: "the foundations of the country's politics"; "one specific policy". Led by: the Seven Party Alliance joined by the Maoists, labour unions and other organisations; FEDECOR, which was not a political party, with the Socialist Party supporting. Result: successful, the impact was on the foundations of politics; successful, the impact was on one policy. A band says both struggles shared four elements: political conflict leading to a popular struggle; mass mobilisation; public demonstration of mass support settled the dispute; a critical role for political organisations.Nepal (2006): the movement for democracyBolivia (2000): the water war1990Nepal, one of the "third wave" countries, won democracy;the king stayed formal head of state while electedrepresentatives held real power.2001King Birendra, who had accepted constitutional monarchy,was "killed in a mysterious massacre of the royal family".February 2005King Gyanendra "dismissed the then Prime Minister anddissolved the popularly elected Parliament".April 2006The Seven Party Alliance (SPA) called a four-day strike inKathmandu, which became an indefinite strike joined byMaoist insurgents and other organisations; "more than alakh people" gathered almost every day.21 April 2006Protesters numbered "between three and five lakhs" andserved an ultimatum to the king.24 April 2006On the last day of the ultimatum the king conceded allthree demands: restoration of parliament, power to anall-party government, and a new constituent assembly.After April 2006The SPA chose Girija Prasad Koirala as Prime Minister ofthe interim government; the restored parliament took awaymost of the king's powers.2008The monarchy was abolished and Nepal became a federaldemocratic republic.2015Nepal adopted a new constitution.The policyThe World Bank pressed the government to give up controlof municipal water supply; the rights for the city ofCochabamba were sold to a multinational company.The priceThe company raised the price of water "by four times";many people got a monthly bill of Rs 1000 where theaverage income was about Rs 5000 a month.January 2000"a new alliance of labour, human rights and communityleaders organised a successful four-day general strike inthe city"; the government agreed to negotiate and thestrike was called off, but nothing happened.February 2000The police "resorted to brutal repression" when theagitation restarted.April 2000Another strike; the government imposed martial law, butthe company's officials fled the city and the governmentconceded all demands.OutcomeThe contract was cancelled and water supply returned tothe municipality at old rates.Who led itFEDECOR, an organisation of local professionals includingengineers and environmentalists, supported by a federationof farmers who relied on irrigation, the confederation offactory workers' unions, middle class students from theUniversity of Cochabamba and homeless street children.Afterwards"The movement was supported by the Socialist Party. In2006, this party came to power in Bolivia."COMPARED (Table 3 of the page)Nepal (2006)Bolivia (2000)AimTo establish (restore) democracyA claim on an elected, democratic governmentScope"the foundations of the country's politics""one specific policy"Led byThe Seven Party Alliance of parliamentaryparties, joined by the Maoists, labourunions, and organisations of indigenouspeople, teachers, lawyers and human rightsgroupsFEDECOR, which was not a political party;the Socialist Party supported the movementResultSuccessful; the impact was on thefoundations of politicsSuccessful; the impact was on one policyShared elements of both struggles: political conflict leading to a popular struggle; mass mobilisation; publicdemonstration of mass support settled the dispute; a critical role for political organisations.
Schematic, not to scale. Source: NCERT Class X, Democratic Politics II, ch. 5 (2020-21 edition; not in the current book), pp. 58-59 (Nepal) and 60 and 62 (Bolivia), as archived by the Wayback Machine, 9 October 2021, as in Tables 1 and 2 of this page; the comparison is Table 3 of this page (pp. 60-62). NCERT gives the water bills in rupees.

Table 4: Party, pressure group, movement

Political partyPressure (interest) groupMovement
AimTo win and use political powerTo influence government policies without aiming "to directly control or share political power"To influence politics rather than take part in electoral competition
OrganisationFormal, contests electionsAn organisation of people with "common occupation, interest, aspirations or opinions""a loose organisation"; decision making "more informal and flexible"
BaseVoters and membersMembers"spontaneous mass participation"
NCERT's examplesAsom Gana Parishad, DMK, AIADMKTrade unions, business associations, professional bodies, FEDECOR, BAMCEFNarmada Bachao Andolan, Movement for Right to Information, Anti-liquor Movement, Women's Movement, Environmental Movement

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, pp. 63-67.

Table 5: Sectional and public interest groups

Sectional interest groupsPublic interest (promotional) groups
Whom they represent"a section of society: workers, employees, business-persons, industrialists, followers of a religion, caste group, etc.""some common or general interest that needs to be defended"
Main concern"the betterment and well-being of their members, not society in general""collective rather than selective good"; they help groups other than their own members
Do members benefit?Yes, that is the purposeNot necessarily; in some groups members benefit along with others
NCERT's examplesTrade unions, business associations, bodies of lawyers, doctors and teachersFEDECOR; human rights organisations in Nepal; a group fighting bonded labour; BAMCEF

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, pp. 64-65.

Table 6: Two kinds of movement

Issue-specific movementsGeneric (long-term) movements
Goal"a single objective within a limited time frame""a broad goal in the very long term"
Organisation"a clear leadership and some organisation"No single organisation; many groups with independent leadership share a broad objective
Life"their active life is usually short"Long term, more than one issue
NCERT's examplesNepal's movement for democracy; Narmada Bachao AndolanEnvironmental movement; women's movement
Umbrella bodyNone neededSometimes a loose umbrella, such as the National Alliance for Peoples' Movements (NAPM), "an organisation of organisations"

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, pp. 65-66.

Party, pressure group and movement, and the two kinds of each interest group and movementA classification in three columns. Column 1, political party: aim, to win and use political power; organisation, formal, contests elections; base, voters and members; NCERT's examples, Asom Gana Parishad, DMK, AIADMK. Column 2, pressure (interest) group: aim, to influence government policies without aiming "to directly control or share political power"; organisation, people with "common occupation, interest, aspirations or opinions"; base, members; examples, trade unions, business associations, professional bodies, FEDECOR, BAMCEF. Under it two kinds. Sectional interest groups: represent "a section of society: workers, employees, business-persons, industrialists, followers of a religion, caste group, etc."; concerned with "the betterment and well-being of their members, not society in general"; members benefit, that is the purpose; examples, trade unions, business associations, bodies of lawyers, doctors and teachers. Public interest (promotional) groups: represent "some common or general interest that needs to be defended"; "collective rather than selective good", helping groups other than their own members; members do not necessarily benefit; examples, FEDECOR, human rights organisations in Nepal, a group fighting bonded labour, BAMCEF. Column 3, movement: aim, to influence politics rather than take part in electoral competition; organisation, "a loose organisation" with decision making "more informal and flexible"; base, "spontaneous mass participation"; examples, Narmada Bachao Andolan, Movement for Right to Information, Anti-liquor Movement, Women's Movement, Environmental Movement. Under it two kinds. Issue-specific movements: "a single objective within a limited time frame"; "a clear leadership and some organisation"; "their active life is usually short"; examples, Nepal's movement for democracy and Narmada Bachao Andolan. Generic (long-term) movements: "a broad goal in the very long term"; no single organisation, many groups with independent leadership share a broad objective; long term, more than one issue; examples, environmental movement and women's movement; sometimes a loose umbrella such as the National Alliance for Peoples' Movements (NAPM), "an organisation of organisations".Political partyPressure (interest) groupMovementAimTo win and use political power.OrganisationFormal, contests elections.BaseVoters and members.NCERT's examplesAsom Gana Parishad, DMK, AIADMK.AimTo influence government policieswithout aiming "to directly controlor share political power".OrganisationPeople with "common occupation,interest, aspirations or opinions".BaseMembers.NCERT's examplesTrade unions, business associations,professional bodies, FEDECOR, BAMCEF.AimTo influence politics rather thantake part in electoral competition.Organisation"a loose organisation"; decisionmaking "more informal and flexible".Base"spontaneous mass participation".NCERT's examplesNarmada Bachao Andolan, Movement forRight to Information, Anti-liquorMovement, Women's Movement,Environmental Movement.Sectional interest groupsWhom they represent"a section of society: workers,employees, business-persons,industrialists, followers of areligion, caste group, etc."Main concern"the betterment and well-being oftheir members, not society ingeneral".Do members benefit?Yes, that is the purpose.NCERT's examplesTrade unions, business associations,bodies of lawyers, doctors andteachers.Public interest(promotional) groupsWhom they represent"some common or general interest thatneeds to be defended".Main concern"collective rather than selectivegood"; they help groups other thantheir own members.Do members benefit?Not necessarily; in some groupsmembers benefit along with others.NCERT's examplesFEDECOR; human rights organisationsin Nepal; a group fighting bondedlabour; BAMCEF.Issue-specific movementsGoal"a single objective within a limitedtime frame".Organisation"a clear leadership and someorganisation".Life"their active life is usually short".NCERT's examplesNepal's movement for democracy;Narmada Bachao Andolan.Umbrella bodyNone needed.Generic (long-term)movementsGoal"a broad goal in the very long term".OrganisationNo single organisation; many groupswith independent leadership share abroad objective.LifeLong term, more than one issue.NCERT's examplesEnvironmental movement; women'smovement.Umbrella bodySometimes a loose umbrella, such asthe National Alliance for Peoples'Movements (NAPM), "an organisation oforganisations".
Schematic, not to scale. Source: NCERT Class X, Democratic Politics II, ch. 5 (2020-21 edition; not in the current book), pp. 63-67, as in Table 4 of this page; pp. 64-65, as in Table 5; pp. 65-66, as in Table 6.

Table 7: Pressure groups and parties: three relationships

RelationshipNCERT's example
The group is formed or led by party leaders, or acts as an "extended arm" of a partyMost trade unions and students' organisations in India, set up by or affiliated to a major party
A party grows out of a movementThe Assam movement led by students against "foreigners" led to the Asom Gana Parishad; the DMK and the AIADMK trace their roots to "a long-drawn social reform movement during the 1930s and 1940s"
Indirect: opposed positions, but in dialogue and negotiationMovement groups raise new issues that parties take up; "Most of the new leadership of political parties comes from interest or movement groups."

Source: NCERT, ch. 5, 2020-21 edition, p. 67.

Pressure groups and parties: three relationships, each with its exampleTwo end boxes, a pressure group or movement on the left and a political party on the right, joined by three lanes, one per relationship in Table 7 of the page. Lane 1: the group is formed or led by party leaders, or acts as an "extended arm" of a party; an arrow runs from the party to the group; NCERT's example is most trade unions and students' organisations in India, set up by or affiliated to a major party. Lane 2: a party grows out of a movement; an arrow runs from the movement to the party; examples are the Assam movement led by students against "foreigners", which led to the Asom Gana Parishad, and the DMK and the AIADMK, which trace their roots to "a long-drawn social reform movement during the 1930s and 1940s". Lane 3: indirect, opposed positions but in dialogue and negotiation; a two-headed arrow; examples are that movement groups raise new issues that parties take up, and "Most of the new leadership of political parties comes from interest or movement groups."Pressure groupor movementPolitical partyThe group is formed or led by party leaders, or actsas an "extended arm" of a partyMost trade unions and students' organisations in India, set up by oraffiliated to a major party.A party grows out of a movementThe Assam movement led by students against "foreigners" led to the AsomGana Parishad; the DMK and the AIADMK trace their roots to "along-drawn social reform movement during the 1930s and 1940s".Indirect: opposed positions, but in dialogue andnegotiationMovement groups raise new issues that parties take up; "Most of the newleadership of political parties comes from interest or movementgroups."
Schematic, not to scale. Source: NCERT Class X, Democratic Politics II, ch. 5 (2020-21 edition; not in the current book), p. 67, as in Table 7 of this page. Arrow directions show which side forms or gives rise to the other.

PART 2 — Concepts & Narrative

Popular struggles in Nepal and Bolivia

NCERT links the chapter to the Class IX story of Poland, where people made democracy, and then tells "two recent stories of that kind".

Nepal. "Nepal witnessed an extraordinary popular movement in April 2006. The movement was aimed at restoring democracy." Nepal had won democracy in 1990, with the king as formal head of state. King Birendra accepted this, but after his death in 2001 King Gyanendra "was not prepared to accept democratic rule". He used the weakness and unpopularity of the elected government, and in February 2005 dismissed the Prime Minister and dissolved Parliament. The April 2006 movement aimed at "regaining popular control over the government from the king".

The parties in Parliament formed the Seven Party Alliance and called a four-day strike in Kathmandu. It became an indefinite strike, joined by Maoist insurgents and other organisations; people defied the curfew, and the security forces could not handle the daily crowds. The leaders rejected the king's "half-hearted concessions" and held to three demands. On 24 April 2006 the king gave in. Girija Prasad Koirala became Prime Minister of an interim government, the restored parliament stripped the king of most powers, and the SPA and the Maoists agreed on how the Constituent Assembly would be elected. NCERT ends: "The struggle of the Nepali people is a source of inspiration to democrats all over the world."

Key Term

Maoists (NCERT's glossary): "Those communists who believe in the ideology of Mao, the leader of the Chinese Revolution. They seek to overthrow the government through an armed revolution so as to establish the rule of the peasants and workers." In Nepal, the Nepalese Communist Party (Maoist) "did not believe in parliamentary democracy", was fighting an armed struggle, and controlled large parts of the country, yet it joined the 2006 movement.

Bolivia. "But the role of popular struggles does not come to an end with the establishment of democracy." Bolivia, "a poor country in Latin America", was a democracy when the World Bank pressed it to give up control of municipal water. The company that bought the Cochabamba rights quadrupled prices, and the response was "a spontaneous popular protest". A general strike in January 2000 led to talks that went nowhere; repression in February and martial law in April did not stop it, and the government gave in. "This came to be known as Bolivia's water war."

Beyond the Book

Since the 2020-21 edition: Nepal and Bolivia (dated updates).

  • Nepal. The monarchy was abolished and Nepal became a republic on 28 May 2008 (US State Department background note; UN News), and the Constitution of Nepal was promulgated on 20 September 2015 (The Kathmandu Post, 21 September 2015). In September 2025, anti-corruption protests led by young people ("Gen Z"), in which 76 people were killed, toppled the government; Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli was forced to resign. Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki led the interim period until the election of 5 March 2026, in which the Rastriya Swatantra Party won 182 of the 275 seats; President Ram Chandra Paudel appointed Balendra Shah Prime Minister (Al Jazeera, 27 March 2026). The pattern is the one NCERT describes: a mass struggle outside Parliament, settled by mobilisation, with a new organisation gaining from it.
  • Bolivia. NCERT's "In 2006, this party came to power in Bolivia" refers to the government of Evo Morales, who was inaugurated as President on 22 January 2006 (NPR, 22 January 2006). The same edition's Chapter 8 (page 08 of this book) calls him "a supporter of water struggle", though it wrongly makes him Prime Minister; Bolivia has a President.

Democracy and popular struggles

The two cases differ. Nepal's movement was "to establish democracy", Bolivia's struggle "involved claims on an elected, democratic government"; one was about the foundations of politics, the other about one policy. Both succeeded, at different levels. But they share four elements: political conflict that led to a popular struggle, mass mobilisation, a public show of mass support that "clinched the dispute", and the "critical role of political organisations".

From this NCERT draws three conclusions:

  1. "Democracy evolves through popular struggles." Some decisions come by consensus, but that is the exception. "Defining moments of democracy usually involve conflict between those groups who have exercised power and those who aspire for a share in power." They come at times of "transition to democracy, expansion of democracy or deepening of democracy", the same three stages NCERT used in Chapter 8 (page 08).
  2. "Democratic conflict is resolved through mass mobilisation." Sometimes institutions such as parliament or the judiciary settle a conflict. "But when there is a deep dispute, very often these institutions themselves get involved in the dispute. The resolution has to come from outside, from the people."
  3. "These conflicts and mobilisations are based on new political organisations." There is spontaneity in every such moment, "But the spontaneous public participation becomes effective with the help of organised politics." The agencies of organised politics are "political parties, pressure groups and movement groups".

NCERT's margin figures ask the obvious objections: are strikes, dharnas and bandhs good for democracy, and does the bigger crowd always win ("Are we saying that 'Might is Right' in a democracy?"). The chapter leaves the student to argue these, and its last section answers the broader version of the question.

Explainer

Kittiko-Hachchiko (Karnataka). In 1984 the Karnataka government set up Karnataka Pulpwood Limited and gave it about 30,000 hectares of land "virtually free" for 40 years. Much of this was grazing land used by local farmers, but the company planted eucalyptus for paper pulp. "In 1987, a movement called Kittiko-Hachchiko (meaning, pluck and plant) started a non-violent protest", in which people plucked the eucalyptus plants and planted useful saplings. NCERT asks the student to argue the case as "a local farmer, an environmental activist, a government official working in this company or just a consumer of paper", an exercise in seeing that each side of a conflict has a case.

Mobilisation and organisations

Many kinds of organisation stood behind each struggle. In Nepal the SPA, which "included some big parties that had some members in the Parliament", was not alone: the Maoists, "all the major labour unions and their federations", and organisations of indigenous people, teachers, lawyers and human rights groups joined. Bolivia's protest "was not led by any political party"; FEDECOR led it, with farmers, workers' unions, students and street children behind it.

These organisations work in two ways. The direct way is competitive politics. But many citizens "may not have the desire, the need or the skills to take part in direct political activity other than voting", so they use indirect ways: forming an organisation to promote their interests or views, or acting together without one.

Pressure groups and movements

Key Term

Pressure groups (NCERT): "Pressure groups are organisations that attempt to influence government policies. But unlike political parties, pressure groups do not aim to directly control or share political power." They form "when people with common occupation, interest, aspirations or opinions come together in order to achieve a common objective." NCERT uses "interest groups" and "pressure groups" for the same thing.

A movement is different. "Like an interest group, a movement also attempts to influence politics rather than directly take part in electoral competition. But unlike the interest groups, movements have a loose organisation. Their decision making is more informal and flexible. They depend much more on spontaneous mass participation than an interest group."

Sectional interest groups. Usually interest groups "seek to promote the interests of a particular section or group of society": trade unions, business associations, and professional bodies of lawyers, doctors and teachers. They are sectional because they represent one section, and "Their principal concern is the betterment and well-being of their members, not society in general."

Public interest groups. Others defend "some common or general interest", and their members "may not benefit from the cause that the organisation represents". FEDECOR and Nepal's human rights organisations are NCERT's examples. "These second type of groups are called promotional groups or public interest groups. They promote collective rather than selective good." A group fighting bonded labour "fights not for itself but for those who are suffering under such bondage". In some cases members benefit along with others: BAMCEF (Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation), "largely made up of government employees that campaigns against caste discrimination", addresses its own members' problems, but "its principal concern is with social justice and social equality for the entire society."

Explainer

"No land, No vote" (Indonesia). NCERT's photo box: "In June 2004, about 15,000 landless farmers from West Java, travelled to Jakarta, the capital city", with their families, to demand land reform and the return of their farms. They chanted "No land, No vote", threatening to boycott "Indonesia's first direct presidential election" if no candidate backed land reform. It shows a sectional group using the vote itself as its lever.

Movement groups

"Most of the movements are issue-specific movements that seek to achieve a single objective within a limited time frame. Others are more general or generic movements that seek to achieve a broad goal in the very long term."

Nepal's movement had the specific aim of reversing the king's orders. In India, NCERT's example is the Narmada Bachao Andolan. It began with "the specific issue of the people displaced by the creation of Sardar Sarovar dam on the Narmada river", and its objective "was to stop the dam from being constructed". It grew into "a wider movement that questioned all such big dams and the model of development that required such dams." NCERT's general point: "Movements of this kind tend to have a clear leadership and some organisation. But their active life is usually short."

Long-term movements involve more than one issue. "There is no single organisation that controls or guides such movements." The environmental movement "is a label for a large number of organisations and issue-specific movements", each with its own leadership and often its own views, but sharing "a broad objective" and "a similar approach". Some have a loose umbrella: the National Alliance for Peoples' Movements (NAPM) "is an organisation of organisations" that coordinates many peoples' movements.

Beyond the Book

Movements and policy in India: three dated cases.

  • The Narmada Bachao Andolan and the courts. The movement did not reach its first objective. In Narmada Bachao Andolan v Union of India (18 October 2000), the Supreme Court allowed construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam to continue in line with the tribunal's award, with further raising of the dam tied to resettlement and rehabilitation. A movement can change the terms of a debate without winning its case.
  • Right to information. NCERT lists the Movement for Right to Information among its examples, and its margin calls the RTI Act, 2005 "a landmark legislation passed by our Parliament". The Act (No. 22 of 2005) is dated 15 June 2005; a few sections came into force at once, and the rest "on the one hundred and twentieth day of its enactment", 12 October 2005 (Central Information Commission's copy of the Act).
  • The farm laws. Parliament passed three farm laws in September 2020 (PRS). Farmers camped on the outskirts of Delhi from November 2020, and the Samyukt Kisan Morcha, a group of farm unions, organised the protests (Associated Press, 19 November 2021): an umbrella body of the kind NCERT describes in NAPM. On 19 November 2021 the Prime Minister announced the decision "to withdraw all three agricultural laws" (PIB), and the Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 2021 was introduced and passed in both Houses on 29 November 2021 (PRS).

How do they influence politics?

NCERT lists four methods:

  • Public opinion: "information campaigns, organising meetings, filing petitions, etc.", and efforts to get the media to give the issue more attention.
  • Protest: strikes or disrupting government programmes. "Workers' organisations, employees' associations and most of the movement groups often resort to these tactics in order to force the government to take note of their demands."
  • Money and access: "Business groups often employ professional lobbyists or sponsor expensive advertisements."
  • Inside the system: "Some persons from pressure groups or movement groups may participate in official bodies and committees that offer advice to the government."

They also try to influence parties. "Most of the movement groups take a political stance without being a party." Their relationship with parties takes the three forms in Table 7, from extended arms of a party, to parties born of movements, to the commonest case of opposed positions combined with "dialogue and negotiation".

Is their influence healthy?

The doubts. A democracy must look after all, not one section, yet sectional groups push one section's interest. "Also, it may seem that these groups wield power without responsibility. Political parties have to face the people in elections, but these groups are not accountable to the people." Their funds may not come from the people, and "pressure groups with small public support but lots of money can hijack public discussion in favour of their narrow agenda."

NCERT's verdict. "On balance, however, pressure groups and movements have deepened democracy." Pressure on rulers "is not an unhealthy activity in a democracy as long as everyone gets this opportunity." Public interest groups and movements counter the "undue pressure from a small group of rich and powerful people" and remind the government of ordinary citizens' needs. Even sectional groups help: where many groups are active, "no one single group can achieve dominance over society", each pressure meets counter-pressure, and the result is "a rough balance of power and accommodation of conflicting interests."

Explainer

The Green Belt Movement (Kenya). NCERT's box notes that the movement "has planted 30 million trees across Kenya". It then quotes its leader, Wangari Maathai, at length. In substance she says that while encouraging farmers to plant trees in the 1970s and 1980s she found corrupt government agents behind much of the deforestation, illegally selling land and trees to well-connected developers, and that in the early 1990s elements of President Daniel arap Moi's government set ethnic communities against each other over land, which displaced pro-democracy supporters and helped the government keep power. NCERT asks what relationship this shows between democracy and social movements, and how the movement should respond to the government: an environmental movement that ends up confronting the question of democracy itself.

Explainer

The Mewat case (NCERT exercise 11). Mewat, "one of the most backward areas in Haryana", was split between Gurgaon and Faridabad districts, and parties were indifferent to its wish for a separate district. The Mewat Educational and Social Organisation and the Mewat Saksharta Samiti raised the demand in 1996; the Mewat Vikas Sabha, founded in 2000, ran awareness campaigns. This forced the Congress and the Indian National Lok Dal to back the district before the February 2005 assembly elections, and "The new district came into existence in July 2005." The relationship it shows: a movement forces parties to adopt its demand, and the government then acts on it.

Where this chapter's ideas sit in the current book

The rationalised book keeps three traces of this chapter. Chapter 1, "Power-sharing" (page 01 of this book), says power sharing "can also be seen in the way political parties, pressure groups and movements control or influence those in power." Chapter 4, "Political Parties" (page 06), notes that "Many of the pressure groups are the extensions of political parties among different sections of society", NCERT's first relationship in Table 7. And its section on reforming parties says citizens can put pressure on parties "through petitions, publicity and agitations", adding that "Ordinary citizens, pressure groups and movements and the media can play an important role in this."


PART 3 — UPSC Integration

UPSC Connect

Cross-paper relevance

  • GS2 (Polity) — pressure groups and formal and informal associations, their structure, methods and relationship with parties; the role of movements in democratic change.
  • GS2 (Governance) — civil society, NGOs and public interest groups in policy and service delivery; the Right to Information as a movement's achievement.
  • GS3 (Environment) — environmental movements and NGOs (Narmada Bachao Andolan, Kittiko-Hachchiko, the Green Belt Movement).
  • GS2 (International Relations) — Nepal's democratic transitions, from 2006 to 2026.

Past questions on this chapter's themes: Mains GS2 2013 (pressure groups as the informal face of politics), 2017 (how pressure groups influence the political process; informal versus formal groups), 2021 (business associations and public policy), 2021 (civil society and NGOs as an alternative model of service delivery), 2015 (NGOs in environmental protection and their constraints). Question IDs are in the Revision Capsule.

Frames for Mains Answers

1. How pressure groups influence the political process. Define with NCERT: influence without seeking power. Then the four methods (public opinion, protest, lobbying and advertising, membership of advisory bodies) and the three relationships with parties. Close with NCERT's balance test: healthy "as long as everyone gets this opportunity".

2. Formal and informal groups. Use NCERT's contrast between interest groups (organised, member-based) and movements ("loose organisation", "spontaneous mass participation"). For the 2017 question, the farmers' protests of 2020-21 are a dated example of a loose coalition of unions, the Samyukt Kisan Morcha, achieving the repeal of three laws within about a year.

3. Business associations and public policy. NCERT's sectional groups and its line that business groups "employ professional lobbyists or sponsor expensive advertisements". Weigh the expertise and feedback they give against the risk NCERT names: groups with "small public support but lots of money can hijack public discussion".

4. Civil society and service delivery. Use public interest groups ("collective rather than selective good") and NCERT's point that they counter the undue influence of the rich. Then the accountability gap: such groups "are not accountable to the people". The RTI Act shows a movement changing how the state serves citizens rather than replacing it.

5. Do popular struggles strengthen democracy? NCERT's three conclusions, with Nepal (2006, and again 2025-26) and Bolivia as cases, Kittiko-Hachchiko and the NBA as Indian ones. Add the limit: mobilisation decides only when institutions are themselves part of the dispute, and courts may still rule against a movement (NBA, 2000).

Exam Strategy

Prelims fact-traps:

  • Nepal's king dismissed the Prime Minister and dissolved Parliament in February 2005; the movement was in April 2006, and the king gave in on 24 April 2006.
  • The three demands of 2006 were restoration of parliament, an all-party government and a new constituent assembly. Abolition of the monarchy came later, in 2008.
  • In NCERT's account, the World Bank, not the IMF, pressed Bolivia to give up municipal water supply.
  • Bolivia's protest was led by FEDECOR, not by a party; the Socialist Party only supported it.
  • NCERT treats "interest groups" and "pressure groups" as the same thing; the contrast is with movements.
  • BAMCEF is a public interest group even though its members also benefit.
  • The Narmada Bachao Andolan is NCERT's example of an issue-specific movement; the environmental and women's movements are its generic ones.
  • The Asom Gana Parishad grew out of the Assam movement; the DMK and AIADMK trace back to a social reform movement of the 1930s and 1940s.
  • NAPM is "an organisation of organisations", not a party.

Practice Questions

NCERT's multiple-choice exercises 7-10 are questions 1-4 (NCERT prints no answer key; the answers are worked from the chapter). Practice (UPSC-pattern, not past papers): questions 5-8.

1. (NCERT exercise 7) Which among the following is the special feature that distinguishes a pressure group from a political party?
(a) Parties take political stances, while pressure groups do not bother about political issues.
(b) Pressure groups are confined to a few people, while parties involve larger number of people.
(c) Pressure groups do not seek to get into power, while political parties do.
(d) Pressure groups do not seek to mobilise people, while parties do.

Answer: (c). NCERT's definition: pressure groups "do not aim to directly control or share political power".

2. (NCERT exercise 8) Match List I with List II. List I: 1. Organisations that seek to promote the interests of a particular section or group; 2. Organisations that seek to promote common interest; 3. Struggles launched for the resolution of a social problem with or without an organisational structure; 4. Organisations that mobilise people with a view to win political power. List II: A. Movement; B. Political parties; C. Sectional interest groups; D. Public interest groups.
(a) C D B A
(b) C D A B
(c) D C B A
(d) B C D A

Answer: (b). 1-C, 2-D, 3-A, 4-B.

3. (NCERT exercise 9) Match List I with List II. List I: 1. Pressure group; 2. Long-term movement; 3. Single issue movement; 4. Political party. List II: A. Narmada Bachao Andolan; B. Asom Gana Parishad; C. Women's movement; D. Fertilizer dealers' association.
(a) D C A B
(b) B A D C
(c) C D B A
(d) B D C A

Answer: (a). 1-D, 2-C, 3-A, 4-B.

4. (NCERT exercise 10) Consider the following statements about pressure groups and parties. A. Pressure groups are the organised expression of the interests and views of specific social sections. B. Pressure groups take positions on political issues. C. All pressure groups are political parties. Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) A, B, and C
(b) A and B
(c) B and C
(d) A and C

Answer: (b). Statement C contradicts NCERT's definition.

5. Consider the following statements about Bolivia's water war as NCERT describes it:
1. FEDECOR, which led the protest, comprised local professionals including engineers and environmentalists.
2. The protest was led by the Socialist Party.
3. The contract was cancelled and water supply was restored to the municipality at old rates.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b). NCERT says the protest "was not led by any political party"; the Socialist Party supported it.

6. Which of the following was NOT one of the three demands of Nepal's movement of April 2006?
(a) Restoration of parliament
(b) Power to an all-party government
(c) A new constituent assembly
(d) Abolition of the monarchy

Answer: (d). The monarchy was abolished in 2008, after the Constituent Assembly was elected.

7. In NCERT's classification, BAMCEF is best described as:
(a) a sectional interest group whose only concern is its members
(b) a public interest group whose members also benefit from its work
(c) a political party formed out of a movement
(d) an issue-specific movement with a short active life

Answer: (b). It addresses its members' problems, but its principal concern is "social justice and social equality for the entire society".

8. Consider the following statements:
1. The three farm laws repealed in 2021 had been passed by Parliament in September 2020.
2. The Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 2021 was introduced and passed in both Houses on the same day.
3. The decision to withdraw the laws was announced by the President in an address to Parliament.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 2 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b). The Prime Minister announced the decision in an address to the nation on 19 November 2021 (PIB); the bill was introduced and passed on 29 November 2021 (PRS).

NCERT exercises (short answer): 1. In what ways do pressure groups and movements exert influence on politics? (the four methods, plus influence on parties) 2. Describe the forms of relationship between pressure groups and political parties. (Table 7) 3. Explain how the activities of pressure groups are useful in the functioning of a democratic government. (NCERT's verdict: counter undue influence, balance of interests) 4. What is a pressure group? Give a few examples. 5. What is the difference between a pressure group and a political party? 6. Organisations that undertake activities to promote the interests of specific social sections such as workers, employees, teachers, and lawyers are called ____ groups. (sectional interest) 11. The Mewat case: what relationship among movement, parties and government does it show? (box above)


📦 Revision Capsule

Revision Capsule

Hard Facts

  • Nepal: democracy 1990; King Birendra killed 2001; King Gyanendra dismissed the PM and dissolved Parliament, February 2005; movement April 2006; 3-5 lakh protesters on 21 April; king conceded on 24 April 2006; Koirala interim PM; monarchy abolished 2008; constitution 2015.
  • Bolivia: World Bank pressure; Cochabamba water sold to an MNC; price up four times; strikes January and April 2000; martial law; contract cancelled; led by FEDECOR; Socialist Party in power in 2006.
  • Three conclusions: democracy evolves through popular struggles; conflict is resolved through mass mobilisation; mobilisations rest on new political organisations.
  • Kittiko-Hachchiko ("pluck and plant"): Karnataka, 1987, against eucalyptus planting by Karnataka Pulpwood Limited (set up 1984).
  • West Java: June 2004, about 15,000 landless farmers, "No land, No vote".
  • Green Belt Movement: 30 million trees across Kenya; Wangari Maathai.

Core Concepts

  • Pressure groups influence policy without seeking power; parties seek power.
  • Movements: loose organisation, informal decisions, spontaneous mass participation.
  • Influence through public opinion, protest, lobbying and advertising, and advisory bodies.
  • On balance, pressure groups and movements deepen democracy, provided everyone gets the chance to apply pressure.

Confused Pairs

  • Sectional interest groups (members' well-being) vs public interest groups (collective good).
  • Issue-specific movements (single objective, short life) vs generic movements (broad goal, long term).
  • Nepal 2006 (establishing democracy; foundations) vs Bolivia 2000 (claim on a democracy; one policy).
  • A party born of a movement (Asom Gana Parishad) vs a group that is a party's extended arm (most trade unions and students' organisations).
  • Interest group vs pressure group: the same thing in NCERT.

Data Points

  • Nepal, 5 March 2026: Rastriya Swatantra Party 182 of 275 seats; Balendra Shah Prime Minister (Al Jazeera, 27 March 2026).
  • Bolivia: Evo Morales inaugurated President, 22 January 2006 (NPR).
  • RTI Act, 2005: dated 15 June 2005; most provisions in force from 12 October 2005.
  • Farm laws: passed September 2020; repeal announced 19 November 2021; Repeal Bill passed 29 November 2021.
  • Narmada Bachao Andolan v Union of India: 18 October 2000.

PYQ Pattern

  • Mains GS2: gs2-pyq-2013-16 (pressure groups as the informal face of politics), gs2-pyq-2017-04 (how pressure groups influence the political process; informal vs formal), gs2-pyq-2021-07 (business associations and public policy), gs2-pyq-2021-19 (civil society and NGOs in service delivery), gs2-pyq-2015-10 (NGOs in environmental protection).

Sources

  • NCERT, Democratic Politics II, Textbook in Political Science for Class X, ch. 5 "Popular Struggles and Movements", 2020-21 edition (file jess405.pdf in the whole-book zip), as archived on 9 October 2021 — Wayback Machine.
  • NCERT, Democratic Politics II, ch. 1 "Power-sharing", Reprint 2026-27 — ncert.nic.in PDF; ch. 4 "Political Parties", Reprint 2026-27 — ncert.nic.in PDF.
  • Al Jazeera, on Nepal's new Prime Minister being sworn in, 27 March 2026 — aljazeera.com.
  • US Department of State, Background Note: Nepal (archived), on the Constituent Assembly's first session of 28 May 2008 — 2009-2017.state.gov.
  • UN News, "Secretary-General congratulates first President of Nepal", 22 July 2008 — news.un.org.
  • The Kathmandu Post, on the promulgation of Nepal's Constitution, 21 September 2015 — kathmandupost.com.
  • NPR, on Evo Morales's inauguration as President of Bolivia, 22 January 2006 — npr.org.
  • PIB (Prime Minister's Office), "Prime Minister addresses the Nation", 19 November 2021 — PIB 1773138.
  • PRS Legislative Research, The Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 2021 — prsindia.org.
  • Associated Press (via CBC), on the decision to repeal the farm laws, 19 November 2021 — cbc.ca.
  • The Right to Information Act, 2005 (No. 22 of 2005), Central Information Commission's copy — cic.gov.in PDF.
  • Supreme Court of India, Narmada Bachao Andolan v Union of India, judgment of 18 October 2000.